according to the article, city council counselors received this information. massachusetts voters do not need i.d. to vote. according to the article, they were called to a neighborhood to investigate reports that voters were being photographed by the leader of a group called activate worcester. a person who happens to be a former local leader of a local branch of the tea party. they told the paper, quote, this was an escalated organized effort to intimidate, confuse and block people from voting. keep in mind, all of this is happening in a solidly blue democratic state in a primary where all of 2500 people cast a ballot for a state representative. imagine what's going to happen on swing states on election day. all right. intimidation of voters is illegal, right? this is a different sort of thing. >> yeah. i mean, basically what we are talking about is rassment. i love the name a lot are using, the pure ballot bullies. we are fighting the same fights that were fought in the '50s or '60s whether it is poll taxes or literacy tests, rather than people from the klan